Ramblings

Nothing really important

Sensible suggestion but was unfortunately shot down

I just read NCMP Sylvia Lim’s suggestion on providing temporary financial relief to those who have been retrenched but yet to find a new job.

The ‘Job Seeker Allowance’ proposal she has put forth is reasonable because of the proposed safeguards to prevent abuse. And, it comes at a fraction of the cost of the Jobs Credit Scheme. Too bad she got shot down by the PAP folks who probably don’t want her to gain any political points, even though it’s a reasonable solution.

Come on, PAP. Sylvia Lim is essentially suggesting aiding people who are trying to help themselves. What is there to disagree with? She’s not advocating giving free money to lazy bums. The PAP doesn’t want to develop a crutch mentality amongst Singaporeans, right? So what’s the problem with Sylvia Lim’s suggestion, other than the fact she’s from the Worker’s Party?

Why worry about setting a precedent to tap on reserves?

It seems that there are some people who are quite concerned that the government is setting a precedent (and it seems to be a negative precedent) by signaling its intention of dipping into the reserves during this year’s Budget announcement. I don’t see what is there to worry about. Maybe a little story will illustrate my thoughts better.

Once upon a time, there lived a rich old man. He had a poor and difficult childhood but through a combination of persistence, hard work, shrewd actions and a dose good luck, he managed to build up a business empire and became a billionaire.

Even though he was extremely rich, he kept all his riches in bank vaults. He was so afraid that once he started spending his riches, he will not be able to stop. One day, he had a heart attack and died. As he looked down from the heavens, he realised that he had been a stupid man his entire life. Even though he had accumulated so much money, it is all sitting in the bank vaults and he can’t bring them along with him to heaven.

The moral of the story is that it is seriously stupid to hoard money for the sake of hoarding it. This doesn’t mean one should be a free-wheeling spender, though. Rather, if the situation calls for savings to be spent, then it should be spent. The number of zeroes in the bank account book is meaningless unless the money is actually used to do something.

I think the government is correct to signal that it’s prepared to use the reserves to help Singapore weather the storm if the need arises. This is not an issue of whether it’s a good precedent or bad precedent. It’s an issue of whether the money will be well-spent, and I think it is justifiable to tap on the reserves in a global recession if the need arises.

Singaporeans: A curious breed to many

I just landed in Singapore less than 6 hours ago, and I might be having jet lag, so this explains why I’m here writing a quick entry.

My month-long stay in America was a pretty great one. I stayed mainly on the East coast, though. I’ll need to make another trip to explore the West coast. I shall not bore anyone with detailed descriptions of what I did day to day, but what I did find interesting is that a number of Americans I spoke to expressed surprise at my level of command of English (I had the same experience a few years back in England). Interestingly, I’ve spoken to some folks from China before, and I remember them remarking that I speak Mandarin pretty well too (I must admit that my command of Mandarin pales greatly compared to English).

Of course, my experiences are anecdotal evidence but it seems to me that Singaporeans seem to be somewhat of a curious breed or even mysterious breed to people who have not had the chance to interact with a Singaporean. To Americans and the British, the assumption is that because I look Chinese, expectations of my English language ability drop a few notches. To Chinese folks from China, because I’m an overseas Chinese, expectations of my Mandarin language ability drop a few notches too.

I don’t know whether this is a good or bad thing, but I always find the phenomenon interesting. And I am quite thankful for being in an education system that encourage bilingualism, although I have to add the caveat that it is not easy to handle two languages. Somehow, one will always seem to be dominant and this creates confusion at times. I have a tendency to think in English most of the time and I sometimes end up speaking Mandarin using English sentence structure. :sad:

And of course, I’ve encountered some people who asked if Singapore is in China. :mrgreen:

Away from Singapore

I’m currently typing this in Detroit airport. I’ll be traveling in USA for a month so I’m not quite sure how updates will be like but I’ll try to update as often as I can.

Beware overnight coaches to Malaysia

I came back this morning from Malaysia on an overnight coach from Perak after attending a friend’s wedding there. I came back safely but if you read the news, you will know that a coach traveling towards Singapore from Perak crashed the day before, killing nine people. And, among the dead was a guest, a 26 year-old doctor, at the same wedding I attended.

It seems that overnight coach drivers have a propensity to be reckless. I was fast asleep on my way to Perak but my friend who was beside me told me the coach driver was going as fast as cars on the North-South highway (that means at least 110km per hour). Of course, anecdotal evidence cannot be generalized but when one combines reckless speeding with poor visibility at night (and now, the rainy season), the recipe for disaster is complete.

I guess taking a day coach would at least eliminate the visibility factors for potential accidents. My friends and I got the news when we were still in Perak and it was mega dampener on our mood. I cannot imagine how my two friends who got married felt. This is perhaps the last time I’m going to sit on an overnight coach to Malaysia.

Brands’ Singapore-Malaysia blogger challenge

As part of my new year resolution (I know it’s not 2009 yet but I’m trying to keep the momentum), I’m going to make a second post in a single day.

Some of you might know that Brands, most famous for their chicken essence, organised a Singapore-Malaysia blogger challenge today, the first of its kind (or at least, it’s the first I know of). Basically, it’s a competition between a team of 5 Singaporean bloggers and 5 Malaysian bloggers. Representing Singapore were Eastcoastlife, Mr Endoh, Wilfrid Wong, Sheylara and myself. Malaysia was represented by Red Mummy, Sultan Mufazzar, KY, Suanie and Capt’n Hook, who was standing in for Babe in the City – KL.

I got the invitation from Brands because Eastcoastlife recommended me. Prior to this, I’ve not been in contact with her and I was kinda wondering why she recommended me, especially when this blog has been in graveyard status for a while. I kinda put the thing on the back burner due to more pressing deadlines as a student and teacher but eventually, I said yes because I was assured it wasn’t anything too onerous (thankfully, they didn’t bluff me on this count).

So, I had been drinking a bottle of chicken essence every day for the past two weeks as part of the preparation for the challenge, along with trying out the set of puzzles Brands gave to the bloggers who were to take part in the challenge. I realised I suck at certain types of mental challenges, which thankfully my team mates today more than made up for. I was a little disappointed that logic type of questions weren’t featured, though. I guess those questions typically take much more time to solve so the organisers probably decided to go for questions involving memory, concentration and simple arithmetic.

In the end, Team Singapore won the challenge, but not by much. The final score was 47-54. I remarked to Endoh and Eastcoastlife’s husband (who was there with us) that it looked like a great 4D number. Let’s see if the number will be today’s 4D draw’s top prize. It certainly felt good to win the challenge but what was even better was to meet fellow bloggers and get to know more of the actual person behind the blog. I had a really great time chatting with Eastcoastlife, Endoh, Wilfrid and Sheylara. They are extremely easy-going, friendly, and more importantly, funny and humourous folks. I’m certainly glad to have the chance to meet them in person today.

It was also really cool to chat with the Malaysian bloggers too. Socio-political stuff is one of the things I dabble in on this blog so it was an eye-opener to hear from some of the Malaysian bloggers the situation for Malaysian bloggers who choose to dabble in socio-political topics in Malaysia. Of course, these bloggers are not exactly a good representation of Malaysian bloggers by academic standards but after talking to some of them, I get the sense that Singaporean socio-political bloggers have it really good compared to them.

I don’t have pictures because I didn’t bring a camera (it’s half-way round the globe in Massachusetts with my wife). Wilfrid, however, had this ultra professional digital SLR which he was constantly snapping pictures with, so I guess he’ll probably put up more pictures on his site once he gets the chance to sit down and download them from his SLR so check his site for pictures.

It’s now time for me to get back to work and I’ll try and post an entry on my thoughts about the Bangkok crisis in a couple of days. I consider myself to be a liberal in terms of my political views but what’s happening in Bangkok has made me revise my position a little, which I’ll talk about in my next entry.

This blog is not dead and neither am I

Don’t worry. My blog is still alive, and I am too. The reason why this blog hasn’t been updated in months is because of work. My blog activity has, for the past year, been pretty much seasonal. When the teaching semester starts in NUS, my blog activity tends to drop to zero as the semester progresses, and towards the end of the semester, my blog activity tends to pick up again.

I have a million things I want to write about but I’ve been putting them off because of various commitments and issues. I recognise this is not a good excuse, so one of my new year resolutions (it’s a little early, I know) is to commit myself to blogging at least once a week, if not more.

So, for those who have been checking my blog from time to time, I apologise for my virtual disappearance and I’m now back to more active blogging. :)

Pro family policies: as good as it gets

The newly unveiled measures to encourage Singaporeans to have more babies is about the best that the government can offer to help couple remove financial hesitations with regards to having babies. Of course, some people will say that more can be done and should be done but I think the government has offered a fairly generous and reasonable package of incentives and there really isn’t much left that can be done.

While money is no longer a big obstacle to having babies given the rather generous handouts, there are other concerns that I have which the government cannot possibly address, and I don’t expect the government to even try. It’s a personal battle that I have to fight together with my wife.

Unlike a few generations ago where the mentality towards having kids leans towards “have them first and worry about bringing them up later”, I think these days, particularly among the more highly educated Singaporeans, the mentality has reversed. One can point to many factors that cause this reversal but the point is, the reversal in mentality is here to stay. And, I am unable to (at least not yet) convince myself to adopt the mentality of the folks from my grandparents’ era towards having kids.

There are a couple of personal reasons for this. The biggest reason is the high level of competitiveness in schools and I’ve seen for myself the kinds of tremendous negative consequences such competitiveness have on people I know. I will not provide details to protect the identities of the persons I am referring to but it scares me. Seeing such cases have enlightened me and while I might not pressure my future kids in school, the level of competitiveness in schools might just make my kid voluntarily pressure himself/herself.

I would hesitate to blame the education system for providing pressure on students, though. I think it’s more of parents who are causing voluntary pressure in kids. Some parents send their children for all kinds of tuition and enrichment classes and children do share such experiences with classmates. If the majority of the kids in the class have extra tuition and enrichment classes, kids who don’t are going to be seen as an anomaly and they will feel pressured even though these kids might have enlightened parents who are trying their best to avoid pressuring the kid. Such a pressurized education environment isn’t something the government can address with policies.

And of course, there’s National Service for boys. I’ve been through National Service and it’s not completely bad. I learned quite a few things out of it. However, I didn’t have a choice. And I want my son (if I have one) to have a choice. If I cannot let him have a choice, then I rather not have him in the first place. I understand the rationale for having compulsory military service but I don’t want to have my kid already have the decision made for him. I didn’t have a choice and I don’t want him not to have a choice as well.

So, the bottom line is that while there are no financial disincentives, there are other personal reasons not to have kids. The quality of childhood life is an important consideration in having kids, and now that I think about it, it is perhaps a more important reason than the financial cost of bringing up kids. I guess Singapore is a great place to work in but when it comes to raising kids, I am not quite certain.

Anyway, I think I still have a few years to think. Maybe I will change my thoughts in time to come as I experience more and learn more but right now, I don’t think I want to have kids, at least, not here.

Share the road? Sure, but learn the rules first.

The quote by avid cyclist and Safe Cyclist Task Force (SCTF) member Leo Tan in this newspaper report kind of irked me. According to the report, he supposedly said the new signs that are going to be put up to alert drivers to cyclists ‘stand as symbolic recognition by the state that motorists must share the roads with cyclists‘.

He seems to imply that motorists do not want to share the roads with cyclists and therefore the state has to give symbolic recognition that cyclists do have a right to cycle on the roads. I don’t have a problem sharing the road with cyclists. But, I have a big problem with cyclists on the road because from my experience, many of them do not follow traffic rules.

I have lost count of the number of times I’ve had to jam the brakes in order to avoid hitting cyclists who beat the red light. I’ve also seen a number of cyclists on the road who cycle and talk on their mobile phone at the same time. And, some cyclists are obviously inexperienced and swerve left and right when cycling but they insist on cycling on the roads anyway.

Seriously, if we want to allow cyclists on the roads, they need to learn AND obey traffic rules. Cyclists who do not obey the rules not only endanger themselves, they endanger other road users. Cyclists are not covered by motor insurance (at least to my knowledge). If they cause accidents, they inconvenience other people because the motorist cannot make claims against them. And if cyclists do get into an accident, the probability of serious injury is higher because many of them don’t seem to want to wear helmets.

I think cycling is a good alternative mode of transport but until there is a proper mechanism to regulate cycling behaviour on the roads, for their own safety and for the sanity of motorists, please take the cyclists off the road. I’ve had enough scares from nonchalant cyclists who think that they are exempt from traffic regulations.

The price of growing up

It’s been more than a year since I’ve gotten married (you would know if you’ve been diligently looking at the counter to your right), and it’s more than half a year since I’ve got a place of my own and moved out. I’ve also graduated for a year now and have been working since I graduated.

Looking back at the past year, a lot has happened, and the transition from being a student to a working adult is certainly a big one. When I was a student, there are many things that I never had to concern myself with but now that I’m a married and working person, I realise there are many things to juggle by myself which my parents used to take care of.

A large number of things that hit you when you’re working and married concerns money. When living off parents, mortgage repayments, utility bills, conservancy charges, tv licenses and other expenditures are in the furthest recesses of the mind. Only when you move out to a place of your own you realise how much all these add up every month, and you wonder why you have to incur so much costs each month just for being alive.

And before you even start wondering about incurring these monthly expenditures, you are already hit with the 10% down payment for your home and a five-figure renovation bill (these days, given inflation and all, the cheapest renovation will set you back at least $10,000). For someone who just started working, you find yourself penniless, or worse, in debt because you have to take a home renovation loan.

It gets even worse if you took a tuition fee loan and computer loan during your university days. Now that you’ve started working, the financial institutions are all too eager to start you on your monthly repayment. The end result of all these is that you never seem to be able to accumulate much in your bank account. The pay comes in and then in a week, 50 percent or more is gone.

When I was young, I wanted to grow up so badly. Now that I see and feel the price of growing up, I wish I can be a permanently carefree teenager.