Comments, opinions and an occasional ramble
From iron fist to velvet gloves to boxing gloves
Ever since changes to Singapore’s political system was announced a few months back, I’ve been thinking about why the Lee Hsien Loong government has decided to do all these when it is obvious there’s little tangible gain to the PAP from taking a small, liberal step towards reforming our political system. Reactions that followed the announcements of increasing the number of NCMPs, reducing the size of GRCs, increasing the number of single seat constituencies and permanently entrenching the NMP scheme as part of the Singapore political space were drawn along familiar battle lines, with the more belligerent cyberspace facing off against the cheerleading mainstream media.
I believe that most arguments for and against these changes have been exhausted, so I’m not going to comment about that. What piqued my curiosity regarding these announcements was the purpose behind them, and I came up with two possible explanations. It’s either the PAP has come to realise that being too politically dominant is is potentially threatening to their own political survival or Lee Hsien Loong is starting to move his chess pieces to secure his legacy in future annals. The more I think about it, the more I am inclined to believe the latter reason is more plausible.
Singapore’s first post independence Prime Minister, Lee Kuan Yew, is most remembered for his iron fisted style of governance. In his drive to move Singapore from Third World to First World, Lee adopted a ‘my way or the highway approach’, and while this approach has had admirers, with the more recent ones being the Chinese Communist Party cadres, it has left a bitter taste in the mouths of many Singaporeans.
After Lee Kuan Yew came Goh Chok Tong, a leader with a softer personality but with the previous Prime Minister still sitting in Parliament and Cabinet as Senior Minister, and wielding extremely strong influence to boot, there was little Goh could do, so he built his legacy as a Prime Minister by masking the entrenched iron fisted style of governance with a velvet glove.
It seems that Lee Hsien Loong has decided against being a carbon copy of Goh and wants to carve out his own unique legacy. My guess is that the announced political changes are part of his plan to cushion the entrenched iron fisted style of governance, changing not just the look but lowering the pain of being punched by an iron fist. I believe there’re probably more changes afoot as Lee Hsien Loong continues to think about his place in future history books.
The real question I would like to see answered in the coming years is whether Lee Hsien Loong is willing to stop at donning boxing gloves, or would he be willing to replace the iron first with a gentle fist? Well, maybe he should go the whole nine yards. If everything ends up being upended by the end of Lee Hsien Loong’s tenure, his successor is going to have a difficult time.
| Print article | This entry was posted by Aaron Ng on 07/07/2009 at 3:14 pm, and is filed under Perspective. Follow any responses to this post through RSS 2.0. You can leave a response or trackback from your own site. |


about 1 year ago
What talking u?
Lee Kuan Yew still runs the country. LHL dun even have the power to choose the color the shirt he wears.
about 1 year ago
Pardon me if I bring up old material; I haven’t been reading the papers. The idea of Mr Lee going the whole nine yards sure is a nice thought, but I do not think he would do so, when it would spark an outrage among his conservative colleagues. Surely a far more concrete thing that Mr Lee can point to instead as part of his legacy is the economy.
I do not think Mr Lee is a closet progressivist who is greatly motivated to liberalise the country, but even if he is, the half-past-six measures that have been implemented so far show only too well what the conservative men in white have managed to agree upon. Imho, I suspect that these changes are a form of damage control, and were implemented to stem a rising brain drain.
about 1 year ago
I am interested in .. who is Lee’s successor?
about 1 year ago
er…aaron have you considered the semi-authoritarian leadership in Singapore being outdated? Look at Indonesia, S. Korea, Taiwan, we had a parliamentary ‘democracy’ when all these countries were under martial law. Now they embrace democracy- free press, fair elections and what we were told were all the harmful unsuitable western democracy stuff…guess what? They have not fallen apart but thrive and there is a vibrancy in these societies that we did not see when they were under strong man leadership.
When is our turn for liberty?
about 1 year ago
Sandalman,
Whatever LHL’s intentions, all I can tell is that he’s trying to do product differentiation to distinguish himself from his predecessors. I can’t read his mind, so I can’t comment further.
about 1 year ago
Wilfrid,
I would like to know too. Maybe you stand a chance?
about 1 year ago
Lucky,
You should know I’m a leftist and my position on the state of governance in Singapore should be obvious, although I do question your implicit assertion that countries you mentioned have ‘liberty’ and we don’t. I don’t think you mean to imply absolute liberty but rather, relative liberty.