Comments, opinions and an occasional ramble
New tricks possible from an old dog?
The global economy is reeling, and Singapore is certainly no exception. The question for most Singaporeans now, I believe, is how the Singapore government plans to respond to the crisis. The question for me, though, goes a tiny step further. I wonder what other creative ways can my government come up with to help Singaporeans weather the storm.
It seems to me that in recent years, whenever something negative regarding our wallets strikes, there’s already a standard operating procedure (SOP) in place to execute (or a generic drug to prescribe, whichever analogy you prefer). The first is to send those deemed to be more lowly skilled to retraining so that they can get better jobs. The second is to dole out several hundred dollars per person to help Singaporeans cope with the problem. Of course, you can always count on multiple reassurances by government leaders that Singapore will weather the storm provided that we continue voting for the correct political party to lead the country.
I recognise I am making sweeping statements that may or may not be 100% factually correct but this is how things seem to be, and I think that more often than not, perceptions matter more than truth. I do think that the general perception of the government’s ability to tackle problems creatively is not exactly positive. I am really interested to see what the government will propose to help Singaporeans weather the current storm.
And, what I don’t want to see is the classic give with the right hand and take back with the left. The signs have already appeared. Finance minister Tharman Shanmugaratnam said a couple of months ago he will look at how to prepare the budget to help Singaporeans (it was in response to the ridiculous electricity tariff hike). Recently, the transport minister Raymond Lim said public transport prices aren’t necessarily down even though oil prices have plunged. Maybe Singaporeans will get a handout, and then they will get a round of public transport increases (and maybe electricity tariff increases, if the folks regulating energy pricing decides not to base electricity pricing on oil prices, just like the folks regulating the transport industry
).
Of course, it is unlikely that any price increase or tax increase will completely wipe out the value handouts. Doing so is just plain stupid. However, what such increases will do is to wipe out the goodwill that was intended to be generated in the first place. If the government really wants to give, give wholeheartedly, not half-heartedly.
| Print article | This entry was posted by Aaron Ng on 27/12/2008 at 7:59 am, and is filed under Perspective. Follow any responses to this post through RSS 2.0. You can leave a response or trackback from your own site. |


about 1 year ago
Well, they just need to show they are doing something. The effectiveness is secondary, isn’t it? I’m way immune to whatever new policies that are implemented in times like now.
about 1 year ago
If you look around Aaron. The clever people are already busy putting on their thinking hats to find ways and means to beat this recession.
I personally know for a fact, the brotherhood have been broadcasting for mathematicians, economist and accountants. They are getting the money people into the act and even switching on all their guanxi and spreading the word through their grapevine.
This can only be good and bad.
Good as people are finally pro-actively organizing themselves to beat the recession, instead of relying on the government.
Bad as since they are rolling up their sleeves and putting their shoulders to the wheel.
They probably believe, deep in their hearts, government will as you say, do nothing except offer more of the same.
They may probably even believe, the role of government here is obselete and worthless?
about 1 year ago
They shd be able to forsee such crisis before it hits us and come out with brilliant solutions with the pay that they asked for. Top salaries for an A team calibre, they shd be able to cure cancer, stop world poverty, etc. I view it as a transactional government, a willing buyer/seller relationship between citizens and them. I do not think I am not getting my money worth and I do not expect the same prescription.
about 1 year ago
Ed,
I think you’re right. It’s the standard office code of conduct in Singapore: even if you are not busy, look busy (which in this case translates to even if you don’t know what to do, do something).
about 1 year ago
Patriot,
What the people believe in doesn’t matter anymore. Believe or disbelieve, the end result doesn’t change: it’s more of the same.
about 1 year ago
Dan,
That’s the problem when our government price political leadership so highly. It’s the reverse of the pay peanuts, get monkeys talk. I do suspect there’s quite a lot of unhappiness among the citizenry over the salary issue and I wonder how long can the lid be kept on the pot on a hot stove.
about 1 year ago
Times like this make me realize how vulnerable we are as a country that import almost all natural resources.
Anyway, wishing you a Happy New Year all the way from Hong Kong.
about 1 year ago
Aaron,
It’s been wonderful knowing you.
May you be more charming, richer, healthier and happiest this coming new year!!
Happy year 2009!