I cannot help but feel that for some, frankness and incivility are both one and the same. I don’t think they are quite the same. One can be civil without being frank, or one can be frank without being civil. By the same token, one can be both frank and civil at the same time.

An example might be easier to understand. Let’s imagine that you and I are at a mutual friend’s place (and the friend happens to be a cook by profession) and that friend has kindly decided to make pasta for all of us as dinner. At the dinner table, the pasta is served and you take a first bite. The first thought that comes to your mind after tasting the pasta is that the pasta simply tastes horrible.

There are several ways of telling the cook friend know that he has just made some really bad pasta. The civil yet not frank way of doing it could probably be like, “Hey, your pasta tastes not too bad.” (Avoidance of frankness in order to be civil)

The frank but uncivil way of conveying the same message could be, “Are you sure you are qualified to be a cook? How can this pasta be eaten? Go back to cooking school la.” (Gets to the point in an extremely rude manner)

The frank yet civil way of telling the friend would be along the likes of “You know, the pasta you made today is below your usual standard. Are you ok?” (Gets to the point that the pasta is bad but phrases it nicely)

There are ways to be frank and yet civil at the same time. There are people who confuse the two, thinking that by saying they are being frank, they are automatically given the license to be less than civil, or even insulting/rude. It is little things like this that start ugly quarrels and bar brawls. The world will be a much nicer place if people can learn that it is possible to be frank and civil at the same time.

But that’s just me. My opinion is definitely no representative sample of the entire population. :mrgreen: