let’s not be antagonistic here. we tend to allow ourselves to be abrasive, obnoxious and snooty when we converse in text, so let’s be gracious here.

and regarding mr brown’s cashcows, i think siva choy was a pioneer in that with his kopi kat antics.

For someone of your standing, I expected better from you when discerning a “critical” voice from a “dissenting” one. It is sad to see the masses clamouring for the lame podcasts which you have produced. It’s even sadder to see how this “cashcow” of yours is being milked dry, day by day, week by week.

Then again, I am not surprised, given how you once did to others the very things that others did to you when your column was terminated in a local paper (albeit what you did was on a smaller scale). Anyway, I have no desire to engage with the likes of you, especially here on Aaron’s blog.

Yes, I understand. But I’m too nice a person, unfortunately.

(*winks at IrCTP* you are doing a great job. I just want to tell you that.

Why dont you say something insulting about them to really prove the point that you are not one of them.

You can start slagging off their leader – that should do very nicely

Welcome on board, we shan’t expose your IP,. we only do that to those sub-humans in the brotherhood. They should be exterminated like pest. I agree completely with what Ben and Kitana did.

hahahahaha

“The flak at LHL’s gesture can work both ways.”

It doesn’t. Not when you announce something in Parliament which became highly controversial (even in the international sphere) and then attempt to put the wool over people’s eyes* by announcing a “wage freeze” for the next five years (by then, an announcement can be made about increasing the pay by another 100%).

* Although this publicity worked (*winks at Aaron*) .

I’m not from some sisterhood.

However what people do not know is that he was also a top earning lawyer; apparently just to see him required 3000 up front, in fact he was from Drew and Napier, one of the 2nd largest law firms in Singapore.

Now does the second part necessary detract from his actions in the first part?
As evinced by the logic put forth, you can also say that David Marshall did all the above for publicity sake.

Furthermore, if he is absolutely honest and wants not to be misinterpreted, he should just take a “pay freeze” indefinitely. The fact that his political career is far from over (look at MM) makes it more like a act than ever.