Comments, opinions and an occasional ramble
The fine line between pride and arrogance
Singapore’s recent troubles with neighbours had made it up to even the New York Times. According to an Indonesian legislator quoted in that article in the NYT, in the eyes of our neighbours, Singapore is an “arrogant economic giant, which is prepared to use its financial muscle to undermine neighboring countries“.
Indonesia is perhaps not the first country to have called Singapore “arrogant”. The former PM of Malaysia, Dr Mahatir, has been branding Singapore as an arrogant country for decades. Is Singapore, really that arrogant as our neighbour make us out to be? Frankly, I don’t think so. It’s all a matter of perception.
Singapore has achieved tremendous economic success relative to its neighbours, despite being so much smaller in size. And, this is a fact that Singapore’s leaders trumpet from time to time. I don’t see anything wrong with doing that, What is wrong with being proud of one’s achievements? Malaysia has boasted about it Multimedia Super Corridor, Twin Towers and Tanjong Pelapas. Did Singapore call Malaysia arrogant? No.
Then why is it that Singapore is being accused of arrogance? What exactly constitutes arrogance anyway? Is there some fixed definition of arrogance, or is arrogance more subjective than definitive? Another example of Singapore’s arrogance that has been often cited is our insistence on following laws and honouring contractual obligations. This is something that I never got. Even honouring our word, and asking for people to honour theirs is arrogance? Huh?
Perhaps things work differently in our neighbouring countries. So, let’s just leave it as that. People are different. Why are people trying to impose their standards on us? Why can’t we put aside the differences and work on the commonalities? Today, PM Lee was quoted as saying in Japan that the sand ban by Indonesia hurts both sides. It’s true. Singapore suffers from higher construction costs, while thousands of people mining sand lose their livelihoods. And, if Singapore decided to become more self-reliant as a result (as we did with water), an economic opportunity disappears needlessly.
Let us all not confuse pride and arrogance. It does nobody any good. It would be so much better to pat each other’s back for our respective achievements and inspire each other towards greater heights. Accusing each other of arrogance and using petty means to hobble each other is not only unhelpful. It’s juvenile.
| Print article | This entry was posted by Aaron Ng on 18/03/2007 at 11:36 am, and is filed under Perspective. Follow any responses to this post through RSS 2.0. You can leave a response or trackback from your own site. |


about 4 years ago
kh,
It isn’t juvenile to attack reputation. It’s despicable. Way below the belt.
In anycase, what I’m talking about extends all the way back in history. Ever since our meteoric economic rise, our neighbours have constantly accused us of being arrogant. It’s the rich kid on the block syndrome.
about 4 years ago
Singapore also has a history of calling other countries arrogant. Arrogant “ang mohs” who dare criticize human rights abuses in Singapore. Arrogant Americans who dare complain when a 16 year old boy is caned. Arrogant, arrogant Westerners who don’t understand the uniquely Singapore brand of democracy.
about 4 years ago
Seriously, if Indonesia is as corrupt as what everyone points it out to be, this sand ban should not last. What does it cost to pay the police, navy or politician to turn a blind eye while the sand continues to be shipped to Singapore? I suppose more ships of sand is coming in now as I post this blog
about 4 years ago
Aaron,
You might be right that it is a fine line between pride and arrogance.
And depending on from whom’s position you are taking from. Who is to say that the swelling pride had not been perceived as stinging arrogance to others?
There had been alot of foreign political and economic that our government had made which could had been tempered with a little more diplomacy and consideration for the emotions of our neighbours.
Regards,
about 4 years ago
Pride and arrogance. I know at least one grp in the net who suffer from this problem. One moment I hate them the next I love them no end.
about 4 years ago
singapore is legalistic and rather (self-)righteous. and at times, because of that, it’s seen as cold. but of course, that isn’t wrong. singapore tries not to break rules. being by-the-book isn’t wrong either.
i think that pisses off a lot of people/countries. i think snooty and assholic are better words to describe rather than arrogant. arrogance turns you off. but snootiness and assholism are just plain irritating.
about 4 years ago
Another point to keep in mind also is that a lot of comments by foreign leaders about Singapore is also borne out of their own domestic agendas – the recent attempt to apportion blame to Singapore’s reclamation for the Johor floods; the nationalistic rhetoric against Temasek/Singapore to rally Thais by the military administration to deflect criticisms of the recent coup; etc.
Not to say that Singapore/Singaporeans do not come across as snobbish or arrogant – which I think we do and will always do even with efforts to curb that perception – but Singapore’s very existence and success often makes us an easy bogey and a constant reflection of the shortcomings of other regional countries’ governments.
As much as we can be very self-critical about our reputation in the eyes of our neighbours, one only needs to look to the comments by that lighweight pseudo-intellect scab MMahathir who deliberately tried to sour ties by commenting the Thais that spying via the Shin telecom interest is something that Singapore obviously does. When you take that into perspective, it is easy to see the types of types of personalities we are dealing with and why Singapore may very well have no choice but to deal in a black-and-white manner with such dolts.
about 4 years ago
Unfortunately, Singapore has a poor case. The govt has a habit, to me a very annoying one, of always justifying self-righteously, its position and stand in all issues, local or with other countries, including using ‘legal’ arguments.
Yet, very often, the emperor has no clothes. Everyone can see that the actions of the govt is all too self-serving. Any reason why political detainees like Chia Thye Poh, has to be jailed WITHOUT trial for most of his productive adult life?
Any reason why people’s public utilities have to be turned off because they cannot afford to pay? Any reason why the MOE don’t see itself responsible for the education of disabled and handicapped young citizens, leaving it to charitable organsisations? One can go on and on about the list of less than honourable actions of the govt.
If the govt is everyready to resort to the law to solve issues, It cannot complain if others give it a taste of its own medicine. Is it impossible for the govt to see its relationship and obligation with Singaporeans more of a moral than a legalistic relationship?
about 4 years ago
We demand an explanation from indonesia to clarify what they mean when different officials are saying different things. Seriously, I think they don’t owe us an explanation if they want to stop selling sand to us. Do you think they really have to give us a reason for not selling it to us. Even if you don’t accept the reason given what can you do. Whine that the indonesians are ureasonable and bullies? If the singapore government is really interested in negotiations then they should just go and meet the indonesia officials and find out what is going wrong. We could have told the indonesian government that we’ll sit down and discuss the environmental impact and how we can work this out(even if there isn’t any environmental impact) That probably have opened doors to negotiations and also to find out what is the real problem. Instead we go on the offensive and tell indonesia that they are not wrong. Our first reaction was not how can we work it out together. We reply with singapore efficiency, about how we are using land sand not sea sand. Then we come up with our neighbours are a jealous lot. We might be right factually but to me it actually make it even more difficult to negotiate. Tell me if it is logical. If someone refuse to sell you things and you tell them you are wrong not to sell me and you are not selling it to me because you are jealous of my success. Now do you think the indonesians really owe it to us to sell us the sand? Is that not pride?