Comments, opinions and an occasional ramble
The universal law of karma
Karma is a Hindu/Buddhist concept. The simplest way of understanding karma is to think of it as cause and effect. Essentially, every action produces an effect and in turn, the effect becomes the cause to produce another effect. It’s an endless cycle that perpetuates itself.
I see the law of karma operating in Singapore. Recently, some MPs brought up the issue of Singaporeans complaining too much and doing too little. Well, I believe that the MPs who brought up the issues probably have seen enough to make a case. However, that’s an observation. I think we need to dig deeper into the causes.
The government has been very good at taking care of Singaporeans. From birth to education to marriage to retirement, there are so many schemes in place to take care of the Singaporean. With such a sheltered lifestyle, who can blame Singaporeans for complaning about the government? The Singaporean has been brought up with the idea that the government is responsible for making the decision for him. How do you expect him to know how to stand up and do things himself if he has been spoon fed his entire life? So what can the Singaporean do? Complain lor.
Next, the government is also very good at making examples out of people who step out of the line that’s set by the government. Catharine Lim got a rebuke, Mr Brown got his Today newspaper column removed after a rebuke, FEER gets sued for publishing stories about an opposition figure, opposition figures get sued for defamation and young bloggers get charged for sedition. Not all of my examples are the result of direct action of the government but because of the conflation between a political party and the government, there is an association with the government even when action is taken by political figures in their personal capacity. Since the line is not clearly demarcated, who dares to stand up? Those that stood up became poster boys illustrating what happens when the line is crossed. So what can the Singaporean do? Complain lor.
Our education system churns out students who are very good at giving model answers and scoring As. They don’t question the answers; they just know how to answer a question with the perfect answer. As long as the A grade appears on the results, nothing else matters. Since Singaporeans have been educated in such rote learning and rigid fashion, how can we expect them to think out of the box and come up with brilliant ideas to overcome problems that they face? So what can the Singaporean do? Complain lor.
Then, when the Singaporean read in the States Straits Times that their MPs are complaining that they are complaining, what will the Singaporean do? They go to the office, market or coffeeshop and tell another Singaporean that it is unfair to blame them for complaining because the government always does the work for us and even if we want to stand up, we don’t know where is the line so better play safe (aka kiasee) abit. Then the other Singaporean, being educated in the way that he only know how to answer question and not know how to question the answer will just agree. Then he will go tell his other Singaporean friends. Then a year or two down the road, the MPs will complain again that Singaporeans are still complaining.
The law of karma works perfectly.
| Print article | This entry was posted by Aaron Ng on 17/11/2006 at 10:22 pm, and is filed under Perspective. Follow any responses to this post through RSS 2.0. You can leave a response or trackback from your own site. |


about 5 years ago
“Our education system churns out students who are very good at giving model answers and scoring As. They don’t question the answers; they just know how to answer a question with the perfect answer. As long as the A grade appears on the results, nothing else matters.”
I think that it would be more accurate to say that their PSLE, O or A levels scores would be more important. Note that 1 or 2 points can be removed fom one’s L1R5 or B4 (the lower the better) if one gets A1/2 or below for CCA activities.
In light of this, our education system does give a lot of emphasis to CCAs, but results take priority over CCAs. My school used to stop all CCA activities because of the exams. Ugh. By the way, I’m enjoying the start of 4 months of freedom after my Os. =)
about 5 years ago
don’t you all have first 3 months? …. oh. lucky. i should have been born one or two years later
lol
about 5 years ago
Well wj,
I’m not sure, but I think the CCA points part is more of a bonus. I mean, do people really study for the sake of studying or to get an A? In Singapore, I think it’s still more to get an A, and to get that, people will go for model answers still.
about 5 years ago
I hope to see more of cause and effect in the next election, especially Ang Mo Kio!! (think WSM and WSK) I live in a ulu place, so upgrading does not really matter to me. I hope I don’t get transferred to Aljunied GRC.
(Surprisingly, some people who live in Ang Mo Kio are actually under Aljunied GRC!)
There are only 3 things an MP can do:
1) Help the people.
2) Tell the people to get out of their elitist, uncaring face.
3) Do nothing good, and nothing bad. (ie, just stone)
Similarly there are also only 3 things a voter can do:
1) Vote the MP.
2) Don’t vote the MP.
3) Doodle on the voting form.
It doesn’t take any rocket science to match the above “Causes and Effects” together.
Hint: The above options are not necessarily in the stated order.
about 5 years ago
There are no “model answers” in Social Studies and History elective, and probably Literature, only a correct structure in essays.
And there are plenty of application-type questions in Science subjects, and Maths, especially Add. Maths is extra challenging.
btw, I’m going to a poly, preferably NP, instead of a JC; i can’t stand any more uniforms, Chinese lessons and subjects which are quite irrelevant to Computer Science (read: programming)
about 5 years ago
wj,
you’d be surprised at the extent of rote learning in schools. yes, even social studies, history elective and literature have model answers, at least where I was from. students actually study and memorise the examples given – sometimes even memorise arguments word for word so they can modify them and just mindlessly put it down in their answer scripts during the exam itself. that’s how desperate we are to get an A. it’s a grades-driven, calculating exercise, and the content and the appreciation of the content all but take second place. and i’m glad you’ve found your calling in life and are taking the unconventional path to pursue it.
about 5 years ago
There is not much leeway in humanities as we might like…. as a lit student and the pioneer batch who was “lucky” enough to do social studies i can attest to that. Those who often gave answers which were not the norm or saw things differently werre marked down…
about 5 years ago
Well nedstark,
MOE may implement things like point reduction for CCAs, but unfortunately, down at the individual level, the teachers are still operating in the ways of the past. Which teacher still don’t make their students drill the famous TYS (ten year series) and give model answers to the common kinds of questions? The system will continue to perpetuate, maybe until the TYS is banned? Then again, there will be an uproar if the TYS is banned. I think Singaporeans are not very prepared for uncertainty.
about 5 years ago
jonathan said: “sometimes even memorise arguments word for word so they can modify them and just mindlessly put it down in their answer scripts during the exam itself.”
Aaron said: “Which teacher still don’t make their students drill the famous TYS (ten year series) and give model answers to the common kinds of questions?”
My SS teacher. She told us not to use the TYS as its “model answers” didn’t have the level of critical thinking required for SS “Level 5″ answers. Instead, she told us to :
State a stand
Describe the various factors involved in an issue
Judge the importance of these factors
Make connections between the factors to show that you have critical thinking, and thus deserve 10-12 marks out of 12 for the essay
The only rigid things about it was the abovementioned format, and the textbook’s praise of “a good government’s” pragmatism (read: ERP policies, etc)
about 5 years ago
one more thing.. she admityed that SS was full of gahmen propaganda but she had to teach it anyway.
about 5 years ago
Wow wj,
You are lucky. I don’t recall having teachers like that 10 years ago. Then again, many teachers, especially the younger ones don’t go into teaching for the love of it, but rather, it pays quite well. I know a number of teacher friends who are there to finish their contracts (because MOE paid for their undergraduate studies) and then they are going off elsewhere. I suppose there’s less concern with following the ‘rules’ since they are not looking to get promoted anyway.
about 5 years ago
You made an interesting point on our education system. Here is a posting by Heavenly Sword that may be worth a read.
I have wondered about how anti-intellectual some of my classmates were in university. There was always an obsession with grades and an aversion to uncertainities in controversial subjects dealt with in modules beyond the freshman year.
In my opinion, karma does not negate free-will. But in this case, I see little sign of the spirit’s willingness to change.
about 5 years ago
okay you all just shut the fuck up abt the o levels talk for a second. and yoyobarn why do i see you here again.you should just fuck off or something. now to aaron.you mentioned something about being screwed whatever. aint you afraid of, you know, getting screwed?
about 5 years ago
“okay you all just shut the fuck up abt the o levels talk for a second. and yoyobarn why do i see you here again.you should just fuck off or something. now to aaron.you mentioned something about being screwed whatever. aint you afraid of, you know, getting screwed? ”
that is so hilarious, pseudoessence….
about 5 years ago
hilarious huh. haha wow quoting.
about 5 years ago
what’s your opinion on yoyobarn btw? i think he needs rote learning, because he’s such a dimwit.
about 5 years ago
Please do not feed the troll.
about 5 years ago
hairen. i thank you in advance for keeping out of this
about 5 years ago
I am sorry if I sound like a “dimwit”, to quote pseudoessence.
My comments are always tinged with sarcasm when talking about elites like WSM, and people in white. Although I have not met WSM personally, I have encountered many “WSMs” in my life, and do not like it that they have their cake and eat it too.
I first came across this site by searching for “wee shu min” on Google, and this site was like the first good blog. (the others were adverts, non-English, etc.) I find that this blog is insightful, and has good content, so I decided to stay on.
To use an analogy, what the public has seen about the elites like WSM is just the exterior surface. No one knows how rotten the core of the apple is yet.
about 5 years ago
“To use an analogy, what the public has seen about the elites like WSM is just the exterior surface. No one knows how rotten the core of the apple is yet. ”
you fucking call that an anology? and you’ve just fucking shot yourself in the foot here, joker. isn’t the exterior shown to the public somewhat bad, as evident from the wsm issue? what people probably haven’t seen is how human and like us they are in person. well, yoyobarn, that was a very good post though – only for the fact that you proved entirely right in naming you a dimwit. think deeper and fuck off.
about 5 years ago
Pseudoessence, actually what you say to me is considered good compared to what the WSM elites in my school and workplace say to me.
I am not angry at you, and consider you as my friend, even though you do not consider me as one. Anyone who does not support WSM and gang is my friend.
To link back to the topic, even though I do not believe in karma due to my religion, I believe that God is just. As Jesus said, “It is harder for the rich to enter heaven than a camel to pass through the eye of a needle”.
about 5 years ago
Actually, I feel that karma is more of a “you reap what you sow” effect. And it does not necessarily manifest in the current life time of the people who are involved. For what the “politicians” are currently doing, their karma is not up yet.
MP’s complaining about Singaporeans who complain, which then generate more complaining down the road, is more like a vicious cycle. Unless you’re tyring to imply that Singaporeans deserve the MP’s that complain about them. That would be karma.